Hosting Comparison – ASP.NET Hosting Reviews and Guides

SmarterASP.NET Vs ASPHostPortal.com – Who Offer Best ASP.NET Core Hosting 2023

Rachel Smith — Sun, 12 Feb 2023 09:53:52 +0000

In this SmarterASP.NET Vs ASPHostPortal.com post, we will look at these two organizations in light of Windows hosting from features, evaluating, execution and client support.

SmarterASP.NET Vs ASPHostPortal.com

SmarterASP.NET and ASPHostPortal.com are Windows hosting suppliers and just concentrate on Windows hosting arrangements. ASPHostPortal.com develops quickly in the business while SmarterASP.NET is as of now serving more than 170,000 websites around the globe since 1999.

ASP.NET Core Hosting Features Comparison

SmarterASP.NET plans different Windows hosting bundles on the premise of shared servers, Virtual Private servers, Semi Dedicated servers and reseller servers.

Be that as it may, ASPHostPortal.com just offers 4 ASP.NET Core hosting plans on shared servers. So in underneath, we will look at their shared ASP.NET Core hosting features.

Unlimited web space, transmission capacity and email boxes are fundamental features of SmarterASP.NET ASP.NET Core hosting.

Additionally, SmarterASP.NET gives progressed scripting features: different ASP.NET, Classic ASP, Change.Net renditions, numerous MVC variants, ASP.NET Core, Websockets, PHP, and so forth. Above all, Windows server here is 2016 or above.

Contrasted with SmarterASP.NET, ASPHostPortal.com gives individuals 60GB data transfer capacity while 5 GB plate space in Basic arrangement and 15GB space in other larger amount arranges.

Likewise, ASPHostPortal.com hosts websites on Windows server 2019 or above sponsored with IIS 10. Also, ASPHostPortal.com programming features incorporate different ASP.NET Core, ASP.NET 4.5, Classic ASP, .NET variant switch, various ASP.NET MVC forms, node.js, PHP, CGI, EXE, and so forth.

ASP.NET Core Hosting Price Comparison

The two organizations are notable for moderate ASP.NET Core hosting constantly.

What’s more, subsequent to checking their estimating, we feel that their ASP.NET Core hosting evaluating are for sure low in the business.

SmarterASP.NET 3 ASP.NET Core hosting bundles individually charge at $2.95/mo, $4.95/mo and $7.95/mo.

Notwithstanding that, clients will get free trial for 60 days with constrained features in the event that they need. Moreover, they will likewise get 60 Days Money Back Guarantee.

ASPHostPortal.com sets $0.99/mo, $3.81/mo, $4.92/mo and $11.46/mo for its 4 ASP.NET Core hosting plans. Notwithstanding that, ASPHostPortal.com supports individuals to request a full discount inside the initial 30 days after installment.

ASP.NET Core Hosting Performance Comparison

Both organizations convey superb hosting execution to web masters. Also, the uptime ensure at SmarterASP.NET and ASPHostPortal.com is 99.9%.

There are 3 datacenters under the use of SmarterASP.NET to serve clients. Also, they all meet the criteria of most extreme productivity, upkeep, wellbeing and security.

Moreover, beat data transmission suppliers like AT&T, Level 3, Global Crossing and UUNET guarantee networking ability and reliability. Besides, stores website information in SSD database servers.

The datacenter that ASPHostPortal.com picked is situated in 9 Different countries, which is driving in the business too.

In the datacenter, there are Room Air Conditioning Systems, Uninterrupted Power Supply framework, programmed exchange switches, backup generators, repetitive network limit and a great deal more. On top of that, servers at ASPHostPortal.com are 100% from Dell organization.

ASP.NET Core Hosting Support Comparison

With respect to the support, both organizations think about it much. They orchestrate various strategies for individuals to effortlessly seek offer assistance.

SmarterASP.NET plans committed specialized staffs to react live talk from individuals at whatever point individuals have needs.

In addition, it likewise has day in and day out Helpdesk Support that is valuable as well. Past that, individuals with issues can visit SmarterASP.NET knowledgebase, which is a decent place for self improvement.

Contrasted with SmarterASP.NET, ASPHostPortal.com likewise offers the most helpful support for 24 hours a day and 7 days seven days.

Notwithstanding that, ASPHostPortal.com ticket support is responsive to the point that each ticket will be answered in 2 hours.

More than that, ASPHostPortal.com blog and knowledgebase empower individuals a place to help themselves. To know more input from ASPHostPortal.com, look at it at ASPHostPortal review.

Summary

It is difficult to state which one is better since SmarterASP.NET and ASPHostPortal.com are remarkable on ASP.NET Core hosting administrations. Finally, we recommend ASPHostPortal.com because they are reasonable for each client, particularly huge organizations since it claims ASP.NET Core hosting on numerous level servers. Furthermore, ASPHostPortal.com is additionally useful for .NET designers, independent ventures and even medium organizations.

HostForLIFEASP.NET vs TMDHosting – ASP.NET Core Hosting Secret Revealed

Jacques Hunt — Tue, 29 Dec 2020 07:10:37 +0000

In this review, we will compare both hosting providers that offer ASP.NET Core hosting. Let’s get started

About Company

Founded in 2007, HostForLIFEASP.NET become one of the largest ASP.NET hosting in Europe. HostForLIFEASP.NET is awarded as No #1 Microsoft Recommended Windows ASP.NET Core hosting provider. HostForLIFEASP.NET serve many clients around the world. They specialize in Windows ASP.NET Core hosting. This provider offer wide range of ASP.NET Core hosting services; shared hosting, cloud hosting, reseller hosting, dedicated server. In addition, they also offer domain registration and SSL as well.

TMD Hosting is one of favourite ASP.NET hosting, they have been in web hosting for years, they have built an outstanding infrastructure. All their data centers are certified under the SSAE-16 standard that guarantees their high levels of operation. Raised floors, climate control, 24/7 biometric security, fire suppression systems, water detection systems, UPS & generators are some of the things that make the home of your website as secure as possible.

HostForLIFEASP.NET vs TMDHosting ASP.NET Core Hosting Performance

HostForLIFEASP.NET sites are hosted in Intel Xeon Quad Core servers at UK in their data centers at London. The data centers are well equipped and connects to 10 backbone providers. TMDHosting as explained above, they have good infrastructure and all their data centers are certified under the SSAE-16 standard and they have good security system.

We talked about the hardware of their servers. Now we’ll see how it performs.

Speed Test

Speed is an important factor to consider before choosing a web host. So we purchased two domain names and hosted each one on both HostForLIFEASP.NET and TMDHosting with same theme files. I used LoadImpact to check the loading time of two test sites.

HostForLIFEASP.NET loaded in 1.12 seconds to load which is a good speed. TMDHosting was slower taking around 1.92 seconds. HostForLIFEASP.NET test site was almost twice faster than TMDHosting.

Response time of sites hosted on HostForLIFEASP.NET

Maximum Response Time: 2.0 seconds

Minimum Response Time: 253.09 milliseconds

HostForLIFEASP.NET’s server performance seems to be solid, healthy and consistent.

Response time of sites hosted on TMDHosting

Max Response Time: 2.7 seconds

Minimum Response Time: 312.09 milliseconds

TMDHosting started at an excellent server response time of 155ms, but once the traffic passed 25, it started slowing down heavily. The server become completely unresponsive and the rejection list was very high. Moreover, the final result has high number of failed attempt. TMDHosting fared well for lower traffic and completely fell apart once the traffic hit 26 mark.

From the above results, we know that HostForLIFEASP.NET is clearly the winner for speed. You can trust your ASP.NET Core website with HostForLIFEASP.NET if you need fast speed performance.

Their ASP.NET Hosting Core Pricing Scheme

HostForLIFEASP.NET offers 4 basic shared ASP.NET Core shared web hosting packages so that customers can choose the most proper one according to their current budget and needs, which are named Classic, Budget, Economy, and Business. Their shared hosting plan priced at €3.49/mo, €5.50/mo, €8.00/mo and €11.00/mo. However, now, thanks to the compelling discount the company offers, the effective price of the plans is lowered to €2.97/mo, €4.67/mo, €6.80/mo and €9.34/mo.

For TMDHosting, the price of its fundamental arrangement is set at $ 3.99/mo. By correlation, it appears that HostForLIFEASP.NET is more reasonable than TMDHosting, yet there are a few confinements if clients mean to recover their cash.

Control Panel for ASP.NET Core Hosting

Both HostForLIFEASP.NET and TMDHosting uses Plesk panel for their ASP.NET, the most used control panel. You don’t need the help of a geek to use it. It provides everything you need. It is important to have a user friendly interface and these one-click script installers are a boon to all newbies who do not have much experience with these platforms.

You can find Plesk demo on google and this is one of the best control panel for ASP.NET Core hosting. Most of ASP.NET Core hosting provider use this control panel.

Server Reliability? Any Downtime?

Besides price and features, we believe this is the most important thing to select ASP.NET Core hosting provider. How is their reliability? How is their speed? Just imagine, you get cheap ASP.NET Core hosting plan, but your site down almost everyday. We believe it will impact to your business. This is why we said that this is the most important thing if you are serious in online business. Your uptime and speed are number one.

Uptime is the measure of how well the web host fits the “reliably” part of performance. Both HostForLIFEASP.NET and TMDHosting claim industry-standard uptime of 99.9%. Any measure of uptime by customers is going to anecdotal (including mine – neither me nor my clients have had noticeable downtime with either). Their uptime claims are supposed to be audited – so we’ll give them both a tie on reliability.

According to the monitoring statistics, TMDHosting has achieved only 99.88% uptime in the past month and required an average of 530ms for server responses, neither of which are satisfying for all-level users. Check its uptime record in the following image.

HostForLIFEASP.NET based on our monitoring statistic, they can achieve 100% uptime guarantee with an average 200ms for server response, this is very quick and reliable server. This is the provider that you can rely one

HostForLIFEASP.NET vs TMDHosting Customer Support

Good quality customer support is extremely important with ASP.NET Core hosting providers. If your website goes down, you need to be able to contact someone immediately to help you with the issue. You will also want someone who can help you through the process of getting your hosting setup if you don’t have much technical experience.

HostForLIFEASP.NET provides 24/7/365 support response time for its customers. Although they don’t offer phone support, but their ticketing system is very effective. We have used them for ASP.NET Core hosting, and they are able to provide friendly, helpful customer service. They also have a very fast response time.

TMDHosting in other hand have good technical support. We also try to contact them and they always respond any inquiry through email, live chat within few minutes.

Final Verdict – HostForLIFEASP.NET or TMDHosting for ASP.NET Core Hosting?

If you are serious businessman or web developer, than I would highly recommend you to use HostForLIFEASP.NET. With almost 1 decade in ASP.NET Core hosting business, you can count on this hosting provider. They have good track in hosting business, has been awarded as Microsoft Golden Partner. You don’t need to worry about this hosting provider. We have hosted few sites with them and we’ve not experienced any major outages till date.

ASPHostPortal vs TMDHosting: Who Offers Better ASP.NET Core Hosting?

Jacques Hunt — Thu, 08 Aug 2019 04:37:45 +0000

Both ASPHostPortal and TMDHosting are hosting provider that have been in ASP.NET hosting business for more a decade. Both are really popular if you are looking for ASP.NET hosting service. In this article review, we will compare their ASP.NET hosting service.

For anyone looking to host ASP.NET Core website, you know that some hosting providers can be flaky at best. They may have poor customer service, be hard to migrate to, or not have the security features you and your potential readers or customers need.

With, hosting providers are and, by extension, your website is far from immune from hacking attempts and malware. With burst attacks and automated scripts becoming the new norm, you need to look for a host that has security as a priority.

If one or both of these companies has caught your eye, this comparison article contains information you need to know. Below I’ve listed the five most important things for a ASP.NET host to excel at and then shown how ASPHostPortal vs TMDHosting plays out in each category.

What Makes a Great ASP.NET Hosting Provider?

There are four main factors that determine whether a ASP.NET Core hosting provider will fulfill all of your needs or make you regret spending your time and money on their services. These are those five factors:

Speed and Uptime

If you want to host your ASP.NET Core site, it is really important for you that your site load quickly no matter who’s viewing it or what that page’s content is. If your site is slow or down, people will leave your site.

Pricing

Price is also the important factors to select ASP.NET Core hosting provider. How much your budget that you want to spend. That’s what I’ll be letting you know in the pricing section.

Support and Resources

If you have issues or questions, how long the support team will answer you? How good is the answer be?

Backup Plan

How secure is your hosting provider? If your ASP.NET Core site being attacked or infected by worm/malware, can they easily fix the issue and recover your files? This is really important factor since not every provider have good backup plan.

Depth Review ASP.NET Core Hosting (ASPHostPortal vs TMDHosting)

ASPHostPortal and TMDHosting are very close competitors in a number of categories. One does ultimately stand out as the prime choice once all criteria have been considered. The other is a decent ASP.NET Core hosting provider but falls short outside of hosting small, static, low-traffic sites.

Speed and Uptime

When reviewing ASPHostPortal vs TMDHosting, speed was of the utmost importance. No matter why you want to have a website, if you’re looking into hosting, you must want it to gain some attention and traffic on the web.

In order to get the most traffic, or at least appeal to your site’s target users, your website needs to be fast and stable. That means you need the fastest hosting environment.

ASPHostPortal

ASPHostPortal is incredibly stable. Even when compared to the uptime of the most popular ASP.NET Core hosting providers, ASPHostPortal is clearly a leader when it comes to keeping things running smoothly. With ASPHostPortal, you can rest assured that your website will stay up with hardly a blip.

On their website, ASPHostPortal claims to have 99.9% uptime and will load, on average, up to 10 times faster than some of their top competitors (including HostGator and Godaddy). In several private tests, those claims have held water.

We have tested their uptime guarantee and the following is the result that we get:

We also tested their speed using Time to First Byte (TTFB) and the following is the result:

As you can see above, the average response time is around 0.007 -0.3 second, it means below 0.5 second, just imagine if your ASP.NET Core site host with them, it will run very stable and fast.

TMDHosting

TMDHosting also boasts a high average uptime of 99.9%. And their load times are a little shorter than the average (though only by a handful of milliseconds).

TMDHosting has made a few notable innovations when it comes to uptime. First, they have a proactive server monitoring program that automatically scans and corrects common server issues without the need for their technicians to be involved. This saves time and keeps your site online.

We have tested their uptime and we find that they also have great uptime guarantee like ASPHostPortal. Only the speed matter, we have found that ASPHostPortal faster than TMDHosting. See below:

As you can see above, sometimes TMDhosting can’t perform well in several countries and it takes around 1 second to load. If you compare with ASPHostPortal, ASPHostPortal only 0.3 second to load.

Who is the Winner?

ASPHostPortal won this category. Though uptime is similar with both candidates, ASPHostPortal’s emphasis on smaller, lighter sites helps them keep their site load times as short as possible the first time a visitor reaches your ASP.NET Core website.

Pricing

Though each company has its own price points and packages, what you do get overall can easily be compared between ASPHostPortal vs TMDHosting.

ASPHostPortal

Offering shared, Cloud, Reseller and Dedicated hosting services, ASPHostPortal has a lot of different ASP.NET Core hosting plans to choose from.

Their most basic, least expensive plan starts at just $0.99 per month for shared hosting. It offers optimization for ASP.NET site, and is just as fast as shared hosting can get.

If you’re looking for a dedicated server, you can get set up for just $12.99 per month. These servers are completely isolated and perfect for anyone who wants to minimize load times or needs complete control over how their hosting resources are allocated.

TMDHosting

TMDHosting offers a number of hosting plans with minimal options. These are meant to be streamlined for users new to ASP.NET Core hosting. That means if you’re not comfortable with the technical side of things, TMDHosting is there to hold your hand during the process.

On the basic side, they offer shared hosting at only $3.99 per month. However, unlike ASPHostPortal Hosting’s basic plan, TMDHosting limits the amount of hosted domains, you can only host 6 websites and the number of visitors you can have to just 10,000 per month on this plan.

If you’re looking to invest in dedicated hosting, TMDHosting offers a basic server for $79 per month. That is more than double what ASPHostPortal Hosting charges, and the servers come with hard limits on storage.

The Winner is

ASPHostPortal Hosting gives you the most options, as well as the best value for your money. You get more storage, better control, and growth options that make sense for every level of website or web business.

Support and Resources

If you have problems or issue, who does a better job supporting their customers?

ASPHostPortal

ASPHostPortal knows what they’re talking about when it comes to just about any issue you could possibly have in regard to hosting. They are there for you every day, every hour of the day, every day of the year.

Responses take minutes for simple queries and less than a day to answer if they’re technical or require a specialist of some kind.

In addition to stellar customer support, ASPHostPortal Hosting offers free website migration. This migration process takes a little more time than other ASP.NET Core hosting providers, but once migration is complete, you can rest assured that any hiccups you may encounter post-transfer will be taken care of swiftly.

TMDHosting

The customer support at TMDHosting is great, if a little basic.

If you have a small website or are completely dedicated to ASP.NET website, then TMDHosting can help you there. If you want to be more in control or need to ask technically advanced questions, it may take some time for your issues to be escalated to the right agent.

TMDHosting also offers website migration or transfers, but it is not free. TMDHosting promises that these transfers will be complete within 24 hours.

Who is the Winner?

We can say both of them are good in customer support. They will address all customers issue very quickly and solve the problem on the spot. Only TMDHosting doesn’t offer free migration.

Backup Plan/Security

Security can be a difficult thing to quantify. You have to consider both what a ASP.NET Core hosting provider does to protect clients in a shared, VPS, or cloud hosting environment, as well as what they do to protect them once hosted and to protect anyone who visits a website with questionable integrity.

ASPHostPortal

The security of ASPHostPortal is more than acceptable. Security issues are often most visible when you’re looking at downtime. As ASPHostPortal has little downtime across all users, it’s easy to see that they are doing a great job at preventing threats.

They now offer FREE SSL certificate powered by Let’s Encrypt. For paid SSL, it will start from $42.00/year.

TMDHosting

TMDHosting is very serious when it comes to security. So serious in fact, that many users complain that their websites or files are isolated or quarantined for absolutely no reason. While this is good news for some, it can create a bit of “unreported” downtime for some customers.

As a positive, TMDHosting makes it easy for all of their customers to make the most of free Let’s Encrypt SSL certificates on any number of websites or accounts.

Final Verdict – You Know the Answer

After all factors are considered in this ASPHostPortal vs TMDHosting review, you can clearly see that ASPHostPortal is the winner. Not only does it offer great compatibility with ASP.NET Core website and better uptime than nearly anywhere else, it has reasonable prices and generous storage limits.

That said, TMDHosting is still a decent hosting provider. They have a number of low-cost options that may work best for anyone new to ASP.NET website and web hosting.

In review, if you plan on growing your ASP.NET Core website into one with high traffic and generous storage needs or want a dedicated server, ASPHostPortal will be the better choice.

HostForLIFE vs HostGator – ASP.NET Core Hosting Secret Revealed

Jacques Hunt — Thu, 01 Aug 2019 03:40:19 +0000

The two organizations are ASP.NET hosting suppliers, both positioned in the Best and Cheap ASP.NET Hosting in 2018. Also, the accompanying post will do an examination between their ASP.NET Core hosting, through which individuals will see their disparities better.

Short Introduction About HostForLIFEASP.NET and HostGator

HostGator founded in a dorm room at Florida Atlantic University by Brent Oxley, HostGator has grown into a leading provider of Shared, Reseller, VPS, and Dedicated web hosting. HostGator is headquartered in Houston and Austin, Texas, with several international offices throughout the globe. HostGator has helped countless people get online. Below are just a handful of website hosting reviews from our affiliates and industry experts including: email hosting reviews, reseller hosting reviews, VPS hosting reviews, dedicated hosting reviews, shared hosting reviews, WordPress hosting reviews, and more.

HostForLIFEASP.NET vs HostGator ASP.NET Core Hosting Performance

HostForLIFEASP.NET sites are hosted in Intel Xeon Quad Core servers at UK in their data centers at London. The data centers are well equipped and connects to 10 backbone providers. HostGator is EIG hosting provider and they invest billion dollars to build secure data center.

We talked about the hardware of their servers. Now we’ll see how it performs.

Speed Test

Speed is an important factor to consider before choosing a web host. So we purchased two domain names and hosted each one on both HostForLIFEASP.NET and HostGator with same theme files. I used LoadImpact to check the loading time of two test sites.

HostForLIFEASP.NET loaded in 1.32 seconds to load which is a good speed. HostGator was slower taking around 2.52 seconds. HostForLIFEASP.NET test site was almost twice faster than HostGator.

Response time of sites hosted on HostForLIFEASP.NET

Maximum Response Time: 2.0 seconds

Minimum Response Time: 253.09 milliseconds

HostForLIFEASP.NET’s server performance seems to be solid, healthy and consistent.

Response time of sites hosted on HostGator

Max Response Time: 3.8 seconds

Minimum Response Time: 392.09 milliseconds

HostGator started at an excellent server response time of 215ms, but once the traffic passed 25, it started slowing down heavily. The server become completely unresponsive and the rejection list was very high. Moreover, the final result has high number of failed attempt. HostGator fared well for lower traffic and completely fell apart once the traffic hit 26 mark.

From the above results, we know that HostForLIFEASP.NET is clearly the winner for speed. You can trust your ASP.NET Core website with HostForLIFEASP.NET if you need fast speed performance.

Their ASP.NET Hosting Core Pricing Scheme

For HostGator, the price of its fundamental arrangement is set at $ 4.76/mo. By correlation, it appears that HostForLIFEASP.NET is more reasonable than Hostgator, yet there are a few confinements if clients mean to recover their cash.

Control Panel for ASP.NET Core Hosting

Both HostForLIFEASP.NET and HostGator uses Plesk panel for their ASP.NET, the most used control panel. You don’t need the help of a geek to use it. It provides everything you need. It is important to have a user friendly interface and these one-click script installers are a boon to all newbies who do not have much experience with these platforms.

You can find Plesk demo on google and this is one of the best control panel for ASP.NET Core hosting. Most of ASP.NET Core hosting provider use this control panel.

Server Reliability? Any Downtime?

Uptime is the measure of how well the web host fits the “reliably” part of performance. Both HostForLIFEASP.NET and HostGator claim industry-standard uptime of 99.9%. Any measure of uptime by customers is going to anecdotal (including mine – neither me nor my clients have had noticeable downtime with either). Their uptime claims are supposed to be audited – so we’ll give them both a tie on reliability.

According to the monitoring statistics, HostGator has achieved only 99.82% uptime in the past month and required an average of 530ms for server responses, neither of which are satisfying for all-level users. Check its uptime record in the following image.

HostForLIFEASP.NET vs HostGator Customer Support

HostGator in other hand has 24/7/365 phone, live chat, and email support. But sometimes, their agent is not available to chat. We have tested to contact them via live chat but it keeps hanging and suddenly they go offline. But, when the agent is available, they are quite helpful and assist our inquiries. Sometimes they also asked us to create ticket to support department.

Final Verdict – HostForLIFEASP.NET or HostGator for ASP.NET Core Hosting?

Depth Review ASP.NET Core Hosting – IONOS vs GoDaddy

Jacques Hunt — Mon, 18 Mar 2019 05:05:07 +0000

When it comes to the Internet, you need to have a place that you can call home. Your company’s Web site needs to be accessible, and the best way to do that is to rent space on a server through a Web host. A Web host is a company that allows you to save space on a server, which is basically a computer. The Internet is made up of servers that store information in a form that can be easily retrieved and then displayed by computer screens all over the world. In order to get your Web site on the Internet easily, it pays to rent space from a Web host.

We will focus in ASP.NET Core hosting since this blog is for ASP.NET Core hosting lover. There are many ASP.NET Core hosts out there, and some of them even offer free hosting. However, these free services often come at a price: diminished service or you have to let the company run ads on your business Web site (which looks unprofessional). In the end, it is often worth it to find ASP.NET Core hosting that costs a little bit. There are plenty of low-cost ASP.NET Core hosting options out there. Two Web hosts will be discussed here: GoDaddy and IONOS (which previously 1&1). You can find out more about other popular low-cost ASP.NET Core hosting at http://www.topreviewhostingasp.net.

About IONOS and GoDaddy Hosting

IONOS hosting which previously 1&1 is made by people who know the Internet inside out. After all, United Internet, a corporation which owns this provider, has been around since 1988. It wasn’t only doing hosting. One of their other products is Mail.com, one of the biggest email services on the planet.

And in late 2018, we were greeted with the blockbuster news. 1&1 bought and merged with Profitbricks, an enterprise cloud solution. This is how 1&1 IONOS was born: even bigger and more powerful than ever before.

GoDaddy also became the world’s largest ICANN-accredited registrar in 2014, with over 59 billion domain names under its own management. It is also an online provider for several small businesses.

GoDaddy has always been known for its aggressive advertising, for example, its Super Bowl ads. This has made the company very popular in the general world.

Well, that’s brief information about their hosting business. So, who is the best choice for ASP.NET Core hosting? Keep reading to know about their hosting plan, features, price, customers support, etc.

Pricing Schemes ASP.NET Core Hosting – Who is the WINNER?

Leading ASP.NET hosts across the board, IONOS and GoDaddy are two trusted brands in the ASP.NET hosting industry that have been around for ages. Shared hosting plans don’t come much cheaper than with these two, but IONOS and GoDaddy both pack the features into their high-value packages. By building their own control panel, CDN, and website builder, IONOS takes a personal role in ensuring the user experience is streamlined and intuitive.

Below is the IONOS pricing scheme:

If you compare the price, they have almost have same pricing, so it is draw.

ASP.NET Core Hosting Features – IONOS vs GoDaddy

Both of the companies offer many features to help customers run website smoothly and stably and manage the accounts easily. However, there are also some limitations. The table below lists the main features GoDaddy and IONOS provide.

Both GoDaddy and IONOS offers plenty of freebies and add-ons to their hosting plans. They both offer a free domain name for a year with purchase of a hosting plan.

GoDaddy ASP.NET Core hosting and IONOS do daily backups of your server. But, we have tested their backup systems, sometimes it fail to work and not too reliable. If you choose their hosting services, we highly recommend you to keep backup on your end.

For money back guarantee, both also offer money back guarantee. If you don’t satisfied with their hosting services, you can claim your money back.

Below are complete information about their hosting plan

[table id=18 /]

If you compare about their hosting plan, almost same features too, but with IONOS hosting, you can create 25 email accounts. The Winner is IONOS hosting here.

ASP.NET Core Hosting Performance

Features, however, do not really matter if the ASP.NET Core host does not perform. The job of a ASP.NET web host is deliver your website files to a visitor’s browser every time they go to you web address as reliably and as quickly as possible.

Uptime is the measure of how well the web host fits the “reliably” part of performance. Both IONOS and GoDaddy claim industry-standard uptime of 99.9%. Any measure of uptime by customers is going to anecdotal (including mine – neither me nor my clients have had noticeable downtime with either). Their uptime claims are supposed to be audited – so I’ll give them both a tie on reliability.

Quick aside on reliability – be wary of any host that over-promises reliability. Everyone can (and does) go down at some point. The famous website like Facebook, Yahoo, or Bloomberg can down also. And 1&1 certainly goes down. You should expect a very high-level of performance from your web host, but be sure not to let past performance set future expectations. Additionally, both services promise “unlimited bandwidth” (ie, how many concurrent visitors you can have on your site). That’s a partial untruth for nearly all web hosts. If your site is featured on CNN, Yahoo, and goes viral on Facebook at the same time…your site is probably going to crash. Again, expect a high-level of performance, but don’t have unrealistic expectations or put value in unfulfillable promises.

Back to comparing IONOS hosting vs GoDaddy on performance. Even though we can’t look at uptime directly – we can look at how quickly their servers can deliver files – ie how fast your website is.

As you can see above, we have tested using monitoring tools and we found they are quite slow and incompetent in website speed. We believe that if you need high speed and great performance, then this is not good option to choose them. It will better to find other ASP.NET Core Hosting providers that offer high speed for your website.

How is Their Customer Service

Customer service, like overall uptime, is often hard to judge based on just anecdotes – and companies’ internal metrics are not generally available. Both GoDaddy and IONOS are huge companies with a lot of customers. Usually, customers with good experiences rarely talk about their customer service (especially if the service is functioning properly). Meanwhile, customers who do have problems will vocally talk about their bad experiences online.

They both offer support via phone support, live chat, and also email ticketing. Our experience with them, they are not good enough and far from satisfaction. Although you can contact them via phone, but it always redirect so many times and they can’t solve the problem on the spot. At the end, they will ask you to create ticket via their ticketing system. If you are lucky, they will answer you within 5 minutes, but if you have bad luck, then you can wait until 3 days without no answer. Phew…..

If you are looking for fast customer support, then you can’t rely on them and maybe you can frustated with their team.

Final Verdict

Anyone looking for a ASP.NET Core hosting provider knows there are tons of companies out there, all jostling for position and attention. 1&1 and GoDaddy have been around long enough to earn a place in the pack – but just where does it sit?

If there are 2 both ASP.NET Core hosting above, I choose IONOS hosting than GoDaddy. But, if you have other comparisons, it will better to stay away from them!

There are many reliable ASP.NET Core hosting outside then and we really recommend ASPHostPortal ASP.NET hosting for reliable ASP.NET Core hosting. They have fast server, good features, reliable service and also top notch customers support.

ASPHostPortal is the best all-round ASP.NET hosting provider and scored full marks for help and support in our research. It also scored top marks for the types of hosting it offers, not to mention value for money, disk space, and uptime.

Interesting Facts – 1and1 vs SmarterASP ASP.NET Hosting

Jacques Hunt — Mon, 21 Jan 2019 04:31:37 +0000

We will focus in ASP.NET hosting since this blog is for ASP.NET hosting lover. There are many ASP.NET hosts out there, and some of them even offer free hosting. However, these free services often come at a price: diminished service or you have to let the company run ads on your business Web site (which looks unprofessional). In the end, it is often worth it to find ASP.NET hosting that costs a little bit. There are plenty of low-cost ASP.NET hosting options out there. Two Web hosts will be discussed here: SmarterASP and 1&1 Internet Inc. You can find out more about other popular low-cost ASP.NET hosting at http://www.topreviewhostingasp.net.

About 1and1 and SmarterASP.NET Hosting

1&1 hosting is made by people who know the Internet inside out. After all, United Internet, a corporation which owns this provider, has been around since 1988. It wasn’t only doing hosting. One of their other products is Mail.com, one of the biggest email services on the planet.

SmarterASP.net is a web hosting company offering plans focused on Windows hosting based on ASP.NET. It hosting services include shared hosting, VPS, and semi-dedicated hosting.

SmarterASP.net is quite new in ASP.NET hosting business, around 2012 and has its headquarters in Monterey Park, California. The company takes pride in being debt-free and purchases equipment with cash available.

Pricing Schemes ASP.NET Hosting

Leading ASP.NET hosts across the board, 1&1 and SmarterASP are two trusted brands in the ASP.NET hosting industry that have been around for ages. Shared hosting plans don’t come much cheaper than with these two, but 1&1 and SmarterASP both pack the features into their high-value packages. By building their own control panel, CDN, and website builder, 1&1 takes a personal role in ensuring the user experience is streamlined and intuitive.

If you compare about their ASP.NET hosting pricing, you can see that SmarterASP is clearly the winner.

Comparison SmarterASP vs 1and1 ASP.NET Hosting Features

Both SmarterASP and 1&1 offers plenty of freebies and add-ons to their hosting plans. They both offer a free domain name for a year with purchase of a hosting plan.

SmarterASP ASP.NET hosting and 1&1 do daily backups of your server. SmarterASP has better recovery system than 1&1. Actually is almost the same with ASPHostPortal backup system. ASPHostPortal also have great recovery system. You don’t need to worry if you want to recover your missing files and they keep on their backup system for a month.

For money back guarantee, both also offer money back guarantee. If you don’t satisfied with their hosting services, you can claim your money back.

Below are complete information about their hosting plan

[table id=17 /]

If you see above features, their features are almost same and it depends on your choice and your need. Both offer good features. But if you need advanced feature like IIS Remote Management, WebDeploy, Dedicated pool, and URL Rewrite, then you can’t find on their lowest package. If you need this feature, then you need go to their higher package. It is not the same with ASPHostPortal. With ASPHostPortal Host One package, you can get all this features without any single fee.

How is Their ASP.NET Hosting Performance?

Features, however, do not really matter if the ASP.NET host does not perform. The job of a ASP.NET web host is deliver your website files to a visitor’s browser every time they go to you web address as reliably and as quickly as possible.

Uptime is the measure of how well the web host fits the “reliably” part of performance. Both SmarterASP and 1&1 claim industry-standard uptime of 99.9%. Any measure of uptime by customers is going to anecdotal (including mine – neither me nor my clients have had noticeable downtime with either). Their uptime claims are supposed to be audited – so I’ll give them both a tie on reliability.

Back to comparing 1&1 hosting vs SmarterASP on performance. Even though we can’t look at uptime directly – we can look at how quickly their servers can deliver files – ie how fast your website is.

As you can see above, we have tested using monitoring tools and we found they are quite slow and incompetent in website speed. We believe that if you need high speed and great performance, then this is not good option to choose them. It will better to find other ASP.NET Hosting providers that offer high speed for your website.

Customer Service is Also Important Factors

Customer service, like overall uptime, is often hard to judge based on just anecdotes – and companies’ internal metrics are not generally available. Both SmarterASP and 1&1 are huge companies with a lot of customers. Usually, customers with good experiences rarely talk about their customer service (especially if the service is functioning properly). Meanwhile, customers who do have problems will vocally talk about their bad experiences online.

Our most recent SmarterASP customer experience revolved around a problem with their ASP.NET version on control panel. The support answered very quickly and was very cordial. The issue was resolved within 10 minutes, and we received quick follow up via email from the rep.

1&1 hosting support has typically been fine, but not quite good. Their support is fast (usually under a minute wait) and cordial, but not super knowledgeable. They seem to view support as a cost center rather than a marketing & retention channel.

In my conclusion, SmarterASP is more effective than 1&1 for technical support. I must admit that they must improve their customer support, but overall I would prefer SmarterASP than 1&1 hosting.

Final Verdict

Anyone looking for a ASP.NET hosting provider knows there are tons of companies out there, all jostling for position and attention. 1&1 and SmarterASP have been around long enough to earn a place in the pack – but just where does it sit?

In our research and testing, we found that SmarterASP is better than 1and1 based on their pricing and customer support.

But if you are truly ASP.NET hosting lover and require high speed ASP.NET hosting performance, then we really recommend ASPHostPortal ASP.NET hosting.

UKWindowsHostASP.NET VS 1and1 ASP.NET Hosting Comparison

Jacques Hunt — Fri, 03 Aug 2018 05:33:10 +0000

We will focus in ASP.NET hosting since this blog is for ASP.NET hosting lover. There are many ASP.NET hosts out there, and some of them even offer free hosting. However, these free services often come at a price: diminished service or you have to let the company run ads on your business Web site (which looks unprofessional). In the end, it is often worth it to find ASP.NET hosting that costs a little bit. There are plenty of low-cost ASP.NET hosting options out there. Two Web hosts will be discussed here: UKWindowsHostASP.NET and 1&1 Internet Inc. You can find out more about other popular low-cost Web hosts at http://www.topreviewhostingasp.net.

About UKWindowsHostASP.NET and 1&1 Hosting

UKWindowsHostASP.NET is one of the best cheap ASP.NET hosting in United Kingdom. UKWindowsHostASP.NET serve many clients around the world. They specialize in Windows hosting. This provider offer wide range of web hosting services; shared hosting, cloud hosting, reseller hosting, dedicated server. In addition, they also offer domain registration and SSL as well.

1&1 is one of the world’s leading Web hosting providers. The company was founded by Ralph Dommermuth in 1988 in Montabaur, Germany, where its headquarters is still located. 1&1 currently offers a wide range of Web hosting products, including email solutions and high-end servers in 10 different countries including Germany, Spain, UK and the United States.

Known for its comprehensive and affordable Internet products, 1&1’s unique business model positions it as a one-stop Internet shop. From domain registration to Web hosting and also site creation.

ASP.NET Hosting Price Comparison

UKWindowsHostASP.NET offers 4 ASP.NET shared web hosting packages so that customers can choose the most proper one according to their current budget and needs, which are named Starter, Economy, Developer and Enterprise and priced at £2.99/mo, £5.99/mo, £8.99/mo and £16.99/mo. However, now, you can get 35% OFF via our site here

The following is their hosting packages and pricing

1&1 offers 3 ASP.NET hosting packages that named Basic Windows, Plus Windows, and Pro Windows. Basic Windows start from £0.99/mo, Plus Windows £3.99/mo, and Pro Windows £6.99, this all price is discounted price.

Comparison UKWindowsHostASP.NET vs 1and1 ASP.NET Hosting Features

Both UKWindowsHostASP.NET and 1&1 offers plenty of freebies and add-ons to their hosting plans. They both offer a free domain name for a year with purchase of a hosting plan.

They both offer pre-packages app installers for software like WordPress or Joomla. The benefit using UKWindowsHostASP.NET is they use in house software that can optimize your website performance. Your ASP.NET site can be faster 3 times.

UKWindowsHostASP.NET ASP.NET hosting and 1&1 do daily backups of your server. We have tested their recovery tools and we found that UKWindowsHostASP.NET recovery tools better than 1&1 tools. You can recovery your files faster. 1&1 recovery tools sometimes don’t work well, sometimes it can miss something.

For money back guarantee, both also offer money back guarantee. If you don’t satisfied with their hosting services, you can claim your money back.

If you are judging UKWindowsHostASP.NET hosting vs. 1&1 based on features – we would say that UKWindowsHostASP.NET ASP.NET hosting provides the better value.

[table id=16 /]

Performance

Uptime is the measure of how well the web host fits the “reliably” part of performance. Both UKWindowsHostASP.NET and 1&1 claim industry-standard uptime of 99.9%. Any measure of uptime by customers is going to anecdotal (including mine – neither me nor my clients have had noticeable downtime with either). Their uptime claims are supposed to be audited – so I’ll give them both a tie on reliability.

Back to comparing 1&1 hosting vs UKWindowsHostASP.NET on performance. Even though we can’t look at uptime directly – we can look at how quickly their servers can deliver files – ie how fast your website is.

You will notice that UKWindowsHostASP.NET wins the TTFB comparison, quite handily. That said, you’ll also notice that on total load time – 1&1 also loses. Typically, this would be put down to how the site is setup or how big it is. But my test was with identical, new websites, so that variable is out.

Control Panel

You control your server and hosting account with backend software that’s on your server (sort like Windows on a PC). This backend software is where you go to find your server & website information. It’s where you install software to power your ASP.NET website. It’s where you set up your email – basically just managing your account.

Both UKWindowsHostASP.NET and 1and1 offers Plesk panel, the most easy-to-use control panel adopted by a large amount of ASP.NET web hosts. With an intuitive interface, Plesk enables customers to manage every aspect of their accounts and websites in a simple way. In addition, Plesk integrates with a 1-click installer, with which customers can install a lot of popular CMS.

Customer Service

Customer service, like overall uptime, is often hard to judge based on just anecdotes – and companies’ internal metrics are not generally available. Both UKWindowsHostASP.NET and 1&1 are huge companies with a lot of customers. Usually, customers with good experiences rarely talk about their customer service (especially if the service is functioning properly). Meanwhile, customers who do have problems will vocally talk about their bad experiences online.

Our most recent UKWindowsHostASP.NET customer experience revolved around a problem with their ASP.NET version on control panel. The support answered very quickly and was very cordial. The issue was resolved within 10 minutes, and we received quick follow up via email from the rep.

In my conclusion, UKWindowsHostASP.NET is more effective than 1&1 for technical support. I must admit that they must improve their customer support, but overall I would prefer UKWindowsHostASP.NET than 1&1 hosting.

Conclusion

So – who wins UKWindowsHostASP.NET vs. 1&1 in 2018? It depends on who you are and what you are looking for.

If you are looking for the best ASP.NET hosting based on speed and performance, then UKWindowsHostASP.NET is the answer.

Otherwise, I’d say that 1&1 hosting is a big brand with great prices and lots of features, but really can’t match UKWindowsHostASP.NET in any other category for overall value.

Find All Secret about ASP.NET Core Hosting Here! HostForLIFEASP.NET vs HostingUK

Jacques Hunt — Fri, 22 Jun 2018 04:42:34 +0000

Short Introduction About HostForLIFEASP.NET and HostingUK.NET

HostingUK.NET was formed in 1998 with a team of very successful and proven industry veterans with the intent of delivering the best value in Windows hosting. It is an employee owned and operated company. Their employees’ average over 3 years of hosting experience and are backed by senior staff with over 10 years of experience. With the growing need for affordable ASP.NET Core hosting, the company set out to deliver the best Windows hosting at a price where everyone can afford to have their piece of the World Wide Web.

HostForLIFEASP.NET ASP.NET Core Hosting Faster than HostingUK.NET

HostForLIFEASP.NET sites are hosted in Intel Xeon Quad Core servers at UK in their data centers at London. The data centers are well equipped and connects to 10 backbone providers. HostingUK.NET also have great data center, they invest billion for great data center.

We talked about the hardware of their servers. Now we’ll see how it performs.

Speed Test

Speed is an important factor to consider before choosing a web host. So we purchased two domain names and hosted each one on both HostForLIFEASP.NET and HostingUK.NET with same theme files. I used LoadImpact to check the loading time of two test sites.

HostForLIFEASP.NET loaded in 1.12 seconds to load which is a good speed. HostingUK.NET was slower taking around 2.12 seconds. HostForLIFEASP.NET test site was almost twice faster than HostingUK.NET.

Response time of sites hosted on HostForLIFEASP.NET

Maximum Response Time: 2.2 seconds

Minimum Response Time: 223.09 milliseconds

HostForLIFEASP.NET’s server performance seems to be solid, healthy and consistent.

Response time of sites hosted on HostingUK.NET

Max Response Time: 3.5 seconds

Minimum Response Time: 382.09 milliseconds

HostingUK.NET started at an excellent server response time of 235ms, but once the traffic passed 25, it started slowing down heavily. The server become completely unresponsive and the rejection list was very high. Moreover, the final result has high number of failed attempt. HostingUK.NET fared well for lower traffic and completely fell apart once the traffic hit 26 mark.

From the above results, we know that HostForLIFEASP.NET is clearly the winner for speed. You can trust your ASP.NET Core website with HostForLIFEASP.NET if you need fast speed performance.

Who is Cheaper for ASP.NET Core Hosting?

HostingUK.NET also offer 4 shared ASP.NET Core hosting packages which start from Bronze, Silver, Gold, and Dev plan. The price start from £3.95 per month until £94.95 per month.

Control Panel for ASP.NET Core Hosting

Both HostForLIFEASP.NET and HostingUK.NET uses Plesk panel for their ASP.NET, the most used control panel. You don’t need the help of a geek to use it. It provides everything you need. It is important to have a user friendly interface and these one-click script installers are a boon to all newbies who do not have much experience with these platforms.

You can find Plesk demo on google and this is one of the best control panel for ASP.NET Core hosting. Most of ASP.NET Core hosting provider use this control panel.

Server Reliability? Any Downtime?

Uptime is the measure of how well the web host fits the “reliably” part of performance. Both HostForLIFEASP.NET and HostingUK.NET claim industry-standard uptime of 99.9%. Any measure of uptime by customers is going to anecdotal (including mine – neither me nor my clients have had noticeable downtime with either). Their uptime claims are supposed to be audited – so we’ll give them both a tie on reliability.

According to the monitoring statistics, HostingUK.NET has achieved only 99.90% uptime in the past month and required an average of 630ms for server responses, neither of which are satisfying for all-level users. Check its uptime record in the following image.

HostForLIFEASP.NET vs HostingUK.NET Customer Support

ASPNETHosting.co.uk in other hand has 24/7/365 phone, live chat, and email support. But sometimes, their agent is not available to chat. We have tested to contact them via live chat but it keeps hanging and suddenly they go offline. But, when the agent is available, they are quite helpful and assist our inquiries. Sometimes they also asked us to create ticket to support department.

Final Verdict – HostForLIFEASP.NET or HostingUK.NET for ASP.NET Core Hosting?

ASP.NET Core Hosting Secret Revealed – HostForLIFEASP.NET vs ASPNETHosting.co.uk

Jacques Hunt — Tue, 24 Apr 2018 04:15:32 +0000

The two organizations are ASP.NET hosting suppliers, both positioned in the Best and Cheap ASP.NET Hosting in 2017. Also, the accompanying post will do an examination between their ASP.NET Core hosting, through which individuals will see their disparities better.

Short Introduction About HostForLIFEASP.NET and ASPNETHosting.co.uk

ASPNETHosting.co.uk was formed in 2008 with a team of very successful and proven industry veterans with the intent of delivering the best value in Windows hosting. It is an employee owned and operated company. Their employees’ average over 4 years of hosting experience and are backed by senior staff with over 10 years of experience. With the growing need for affordable hosting, the company set out to deliver the best Windows hosting at a price where everyone can afford to have their piece of the World Wide Web.

HostForLIFEASP.NET ASP.NET Core Hosting Faster than ASPNETHosting.co.uk

HostForLIFEASP.NET sites are hosted in Dual Xeon servers at UK in their data centers at London. The data centers are well equipped and connects to 10 backbone providers. Also, ASPNETHosting.co.uk invest millions of dollars every year in new technologies for better performance.

We talked about the hardware of their servers. Now we’ll see how it performs.

Speed Test

Speed is an important factor to consider before choosing a web host. So we purchased two domain names and hosted each one on both HostForLIFEASP.NET and ASPNETHosting.co.uk with same theme files. I used LoadImpact to check the loading time of two test sites.

HostForLIFEASP.NET loaded in 1.12 seconds to load which is a good speed. ASPNETHosting.co.uk was slower taking around 1.92 seconds. HostForLIFEASP.NET test site was almost twice faster than ASPNETHosting.co.uk.

Response time of sites hosted on HostForLIFEASP.NET

Maximum Response Time: 2.2 seconds

Minimum Response Time: 223.09 milliseconds

HostForLIFEASP.NET’s server performance seems to be solid, healthy and consistent.

Response time of sites hosted on ASPNETHosting.co.uk

Max Response Time: 3.5 seconds

Minimum Response Time: 382.09 milliseconds

ASPNETHosting.co.uk started at an excellent server response time of 272ms, but once the traffic passed 25, it started slowing down heavily. The server become completely unresponsive and the rejection list was very high. Moreover, the final result has high number of failed attempt. ASPNETHosting.co.uk fared well for lower traffic and completely fell apart once the traffic hit 26 mark.

From the above results, we know that HostForLIFEASP.NET is clearly the winner for speed. You can trust your ASP.NET Core website with HostForLIFEASP.NET if you need fast speed performance.

Who is Cheaper for ASP.NET Core Hosting?

ASPNETHosting.co.uk also offer 4 shared ASP.NET Core hosting packages which start from Starter, Professional, Business, and Developer plan. The price start from £3.59 per month until £17.00 per month.

Control Panel for ASP.NET Core Hosting

Both HostForLIFEASP.NET and ASPNETHosting.co.uk uses Plesk panel for their ASP.NET, the most used control panel. You don’t need the help of a geek to use it. It provides everything you need. It is important to have a user friendly interface and these one-click script installers are a boon to all newbies who do not have much experience with these platforms.

You can find Plesk demo on google and this is one of the best control panel for ASP.NET Core hosting. Most of ASP.NET Core hosting provider use this control panel.

Server Reliability? Any Downtime?

Uptime is the measure of how well the web host fits the “reliably” part of performance. Both HostForLIFEASP.NET and ASPNETHosting.co.uk claim industry-standard uptime of 99.9%. Any measure of uptime by customers is going to anecdotal (including mine – neither me nor my clients have had noticeable downtime with either). Their uptime claims are supposed to be audited – so we’ll give them both a tie on reliability.

According to the monitoring statistics, ASPNETHosting.co.uk has achieved only 99.90% uptime in the past month and required an average of 630ms for server responses, neither of which are satisfying for all-level users. Check its uptime record in the following image.

HostForLIFEASP.NET vs ASPNETHosting.co.uk Customer Support

Final Verdict – HostForLIFEASP.NET or ASPNETHosting.co.uk for ASP.NET Core Hosting?

What is the Difference Between ASPHostPortal vs MyASP ASP.NET Hosting?

Jacques Hunt — Mon, 09 Apr 2018 07:59:56 +0000

We know that there many cheap ASP.NET hosting providers nowadays that sometimes make you feel very difficult to choose which one is the best and reliable ASP.NET hosting services. In this article review, we will compare between ASPHostPortal and MyASP.NET hosting services. Which one is the best? Which one is more reliable? Which one the best server performance? You can find all the answers here

ASP.NET Hosting Features – Who is the Winner?

The following is brief information about their hosting features

[table id=15 /]

In table above, we know that SmarterASP offer unlimited disk space and bandwith. This is the point that might be interested. But, please be aware with this offer. Although they offer unlimited space and bandwith, customers cant upload big size video or .jpeg file, if customers abuse this policy, they might suspend your account. If you see ASPHostPortal, their plan is clearly not to missleading their customers, they clearly give exact quota of their ASP.NET Hosting plan. With Host One plan, customers can get 2 MSSQL database and also 4 MySQL database while MyASP only give 1 MSSQL and MySQL database. Customers can also host unlimited sites on their Host One plan, MyASP can only host 1 ASP.NET site.

Interesting ASP.NET Hosting Pricing

If you see table above, we can find that MyASP pricing is cheaper than ASPHostPortal ASP.NET hosting. MyASP priced at $2.95/mo and ASPHostPortal priced at $3.81/mo. With that said, it’s important to note that both ASPHostPortal and MyASP are highly competitive in terms of their shared ASP.NET hosting pricing.

Generally, ASPHostPortal and MyASP are almost the same in terms of plans and pricing. But, it’s important to consider other factors like their hosting features to make a more informed and economical decision. Features that a hosting plan provides determine whether you will get value for your money.

If you see the table above, we know that ASPHostPortal features are richer than MyASP.NET. So, as customers, you can think it wisely.

Speed – One of Important Factors when Selecting ASP.NET Hosting

This metric is perhaps, the best factor to consider when comparing these web hosts. Actually, it separates the best hosting firm from a bad hosting firm.

Generally, website visitors are impatient and they don’t have time to waste on websites that freeze or load slowly.

Research shows that the maximum amount of time that most users wait for a site to load is 2 seconds. Thus, a site that takes longer than this to load has a higher bounce rate.

To enhance performance and speed, an ASP.NET host must therefore invest in and manage infrastructure as well as the necessary hosting resources. This maintains high speed and better performance of their servers.

To compare speed between ASPHostPortal and MyASP, we have done speed test and looked Time to First Byte (TTFB) – a measurement for how quickly a server responds back the first byte of data after it receives a request from a browser.

As you can see, ASPHostPortal edges out MyASP when it comes to speed and web performance.

But, this doesn’t mean that MyASP is bad. It simply means that MyASP lacks similar snappiness with ASPHostPortal in terms of server response time.

Perhaps, this can be attributed to the fact that MyASP provides CloudFlare access to its clients. CloudFlare is a network for delivering content that routes traffic to increase the speed of a website.

Definitely, speed and performance are critical factors to consider when choosing a web host. That’s because Google includes a site speed in the criteria that it uses to rank websites.

Thus, a low-latency page loading can affect placement of a website in the Search Engine Results Pages (SERPs).

How is Their Reliability?

From our monitoring tools, we found that ASPHostPortal is more reliable than MyASP.NET. ASPHostPortal reach 99.99% uptime guarantee while MyASP only reach around 99.38%. You can see this result below:

Therefore, in terms of reliability, ASPHostPortal is clearly the winner.Uptime is really important for your business, just imagine if your site go down like roller coaster, what do you think?

Customer Support Response Times

Just like what we mentioned before, ASPHostPortal and MyASP are recognized not only by their great ASP.NET hosting solutions, but also by considerate customer service. The two web hosts guarantee anytime technical support 24 hours a day, which are of efficiency to solve problems encountered by customers.

Our most recent ASPHostPortal customer experience revolved around a problem with their ASP.NET version on control panel. The support answered very quickly and was very cordial. The issue was resolved within 10 minutes, and we received quick follow up via email from the rep.

MyASP hosting support has typically been fine, but not quite good. Their support is fast (usually under a minute wait) and cordial, but not super knowledgeable. They seem to view support as a cost center rather than a marketing & retention channel.

In my conclusion, ASPHostPortal is more effective than MyASP for technical support. We must admit that they must improve their customer support, but overall we would prefer ASPHostPortal than MyASP hosting.

Final Verdict!

Here, we have to admit that both ASPHostPortal and MyASP Hosting offer the compatible ASP.NET hosting solution. However, if you are looking for the reliable, along with the better support, faster speed and more reliable solution, we think you’d better try ASPHostPortal ASP.NET Hosting.